(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
See other formats

Full text of "Mathematical And Physical Papers - Iii"

have no fixed relation to each other so far as regards the changes in the mode of vibration, which we must suppose to be taking place continually, though slowly, it may be, in comparison with the time of a luminous vibration. To suppose otherwise would be contrary to the idea of common light, in which it is implied that on the average whatever we can say of one plane passing through the ray, we can say of another: whatever we can say of the direction one way round we can say of the other way round.
At the end of his excellent Tract on the Undulatory Theory, Mr Airy has shewn how the simple supposition of the existence, in common light, of successive series of undulations, in which the vibrations of one series have no relation to those of another, would account at the same time for the interference of common light and the non-interference of the pencils, polarized in rectangular planes, into which common light may be conceived to be decomposed. But he has, I think, introduced a gratuitous difficulty into the subject, by asserting that it is necessary to suppose the transition from one series into another to be abrupt, and that a gradual change in the nature of the vibrations is inadmissible. This assertion, which seems to have led others to conceive that there was here a difficulty with which the undu-latory theory had to contend, seems to have resulted from an investigation from which it appeared that common light could not be represented by an indefinite series of elliptic vibrations, in which the major axis of the ellipse was supposed to revolve uniformly, rapidly, with regard to the duration of impressions on the retina, though slowly with regard to the time of a luminous vibration. I have elsewhere pointed out on what grounds I conceive that the instance of the revolving ellipse is not a case in point, namely, that it is not a fair representation of common light, because it gives a preponderance on the average to one direction of revolution over the opposite, which is contrary to the idea of common light*. Let us now apply the general formulae (16) and (17) to this case.
Let c cos /3, c sin /3 be the semi-axes of the ellipse, a the azimuth of the first axis at a given time. So far as relates to
* Report of the meeting of the British Association at Swansea in 1848. Transactions of the Sections, p. 5.